President Salva Kiir Fires Economist Bak Barnaba, Replaces Him with Engineer Awuou

In a bold and unexpected decision, President Salva Kiir removed Minister of Finance and Planning Bak Barnaba Chol from his position and appointed Engineer Awuou Daniel Chuang as his replacement. This move has sparked widespread disapproval among many South Sudanese citizens and political analysts, who view it as a blatant disregard for the expertise and experience in economics that Minister Chol brought to the role. The sudden shift from an economist to an engineer at the helm of the country’s financial affairs has raised concerns about the government’s commitment to sound economic management and fiscal responsibility.

Critics argue that the appointment of Engineer Chuang, who lacks a background in economics or finance, may undermine the country’s economic stability and growth prospects. Many fear that this decision could lead to a mismanagement of public funds and a lack of strategic planning in addressing South Sudan’s economic challenges. As the nation continues to grapple with economic hardships and a fragile financial situation, the replacement of a seasoned economist with an engineer has left many questioning the government’s priorities and commitment to effective governance.

Many South Sudanese citizens have expressed their dismay and skepticism over President Salva Kiir’s decision. Some have raised concerns about the lack of economic expertise in the new appointee, questioning the rationale behind such a move in a critical role that directly impacts the country’s financial stability and development. Additionally, there is a growing sentiment among the public that cartels influences may have played a significant role in influencing the president’s decision-making process, steering him towards choices that may not necessarily align with the best interests of the nation.

The appointment of an engineer over an economist has sparked debates and criticisms within the South Sudanese community, with many questioning the qualifications and competency of the new appointee to effectively handle the complex economic challenges facing the country. As the public continues to voice their concerns and suspicions about the motives behind this decision, it raises broader questions about transparency, accountability, and the influence of cartels on the country’s governance and decision-making processes.