CEPO Appeals to Minister of Justice for Clarity on National Security Act Controversy

In a bid to address the prevailing confusion surrounding the enactment of the National Security Act, Edmund Yakani, Executive Director of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization (CEPO), has urged the Honourable Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs to provide clarity to the citizens of South Sudan.

Yakani’s plea comes amid a wave of uncertainty following conflicting statements from key government figures regarding the controversial amendments to the National Security Act. The Honourable spokesperson of the revitalized National Transitional Legislative Assembly had previously hinted at public outcry against the amendments, urging President Salva Kiir not to sign them into law.

Despite reports that President Kiir had sought a legal opinion from the Ministry of Justice on the matter, the ministry has yet to publicly disclose its stance, leaving citizens in limbo regarding the status of the National Security Act.

Yakani emphasized the importance of accurate information for public consumption, stressing the need for transparency and accountability in the decision-making process. He appealed to the Honourable Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs to step forward and address the concerns of the citizens, ensuring that they are provided with clear and reliable information regarding the contentious legislation.

In his statement, Yakani stated, “We are urging you, with due respect and honor as the Honourable Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, to clear the air for the citizens. Having accurate information is crucial for public knowledge and understanding.”

The call for transparency and accountability in governance echoes a growing sentiment among South Sudanese citizens seeking clarity and coherence in the legislative process. CEPO’s appeal underscores the significance of open communication and timely disclosure of legal opinions to foster public trust and confidence in the government’s decision-making.

As stakeholders await a response from the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, the spotlight remains on the need for clear and unambiguous communication to dispel uncertainties and facilitate informed public discourse on critical legislative matters.